What To Know
- However, if you’re on a budget or if you don’t need the extra features of the Z 24-120mm f/4 S, then the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR is a great option.
- In addition to the factors we’ve discussed above, there are a few other things you may want to consider when choosing between the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR.
- The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is lighter than the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, which may be a consideration for photographers who need to carry their gear for long periods of time.
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR are two popular lenses for Nikon cameras. Both lenses offer a versatile focal length range, making them suitable for a wide variety of photography genres, including landscapes, portraits, and street photography. However, there are some key differences between the two lenses that may make one a better choice for you than the other.
In this blog post, we’ll compare the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR in terms of their image quality, autofocus performance, build quality, and price. We’ll also provide our recommendation for which lens is the best choice for different types of photographers.
Image Quality
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR both produce excellent image quality. However, the Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a slight edge in terms of sharpness and detail. This is likely due to its newer optical design, which includes a number of extra-low dispersion (ED) elements that help to reduce chromatic aberration.
Autofocus Performance
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S uses a stepping motor for autofocus, while the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR uses a traditional screw-drive motor. The stepping motor in the Z 24-120mm f/4 S is faster and more accurate than the screw-drive motor in the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. This makes the Z 24-120mm f/4 S a better choice for photographers who need fast and accurate autofocus, such as sports and wildlife photographers.
Build Quality
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR are both well-built lenses. However, the Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a more robust construction, with a metal lens barrel and a weather-sealed design. This makes it a better choice for photographers who need a lens that can withstand harsh weather conditions.
Price
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is more expensive than the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. This is likely due to its newer optical design and its faster and more accurate autofocus system.
Which Lens is Right for You?
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR are both excellent lenses. However, the Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a slight edge in terms of image quality, autofocus performance, and build quality. It is also more expensive than the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR.
If you’re a photographer who needs the best possible image quality, autofocus performance, and build quality, then the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is the best choice for you. However, if you’re on a budget or if you don’t need the extra features of the Z 24-120mm f/4 S, then the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR is a great option.
Recommendations
- For photographers who need the best possible image quality, autofocus performance, and build quality: Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
- For photographers who are on a budget or who don’t need the extra features of the Z 24-120mm f/4 S: AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
Other Factors to Consider
In addition to the factors we’ve discussed above, there are a few other things you may want to consider when choosing between the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. These include:
- Camera compatibility: The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is only compatible with Nikon Z-mount cameras, while the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR is compatible with both Nikon Z-mount and F-mount cameras.
- Weight: The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is lighter than the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, which may be a consideration for photographers who need to carry their gear for long periods of time.
- Filter size: The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a filter size of 77mm, while the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR has a filter size of 82mm. This means that you’ll need to purchase different filters for each lens.
Frequently Discussed Topics
What is the difference between the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR?
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a newer optical design, a faster and more accurate autofocus system, and a more robust construction than the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. It is also more expensive.
Which lens is better for landscape photography?
Both the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR are good choices for landscape photography. However, the Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a slight edge in terms of image quality and autofocus performance.
Which lens is better for portrait photography?
Both the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR are good choices for portrait photography. However, the Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a slight edge in terms of image quality and autofocus performance.
Which lens is better for sports and wildlife photography?
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is a better choice for sports and wildlife photography than the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. This is because it has a faster and more accurate autofocus system.
Which lens is better for video?
Both the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR are good choices for video. However, the Z 24-120mm f/4 S has a slight edge in terms of image quality and autofocus performance.
