What To Know
- The Nikon lens has a slight edge in sharpness at the long end of the zoom range, but the Canon lens has better color reproduction and contrast.
- The Nikon lens has a slight edge in sharpness and image stabilization, but the Canon lens is more affordable and has better color reproduction and contrast.
- In addition to the key features and performance aspects we’ve discussed, there are a few other things you may want to consider when choosing between the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM are two of the most popular telephoto zoom lenses for mirrorless cameras. Both lenses offer excellent image quality, fast autofocus, and weather-sealed construction. However, there are some key differences between the two lenses that may make one a better choice for your needs.
In this blog post, we’ll compare the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM in terms of their key features, performance, and price. We’ll also provide our recommendation for which lens is the best choice for different types of photography.
Build Quality and Design
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM are both well-built lenses with weather-sealed construction. The Nikon lens is slightly larger and heavier than the Canon lens, but it also feels more solid in the hand. Both lenses have a zoom ring and a focus ring that are smooth and well-damped.
Image Quality
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM both produce excellent image quality. Both lenses are sharp throughout the zoom range, even at the widest aperture. The Nikon lens has a slight edge in sharpness at the long end of the zoom range, but the Canon lens has better color reproduction and contrast.
Autofocus
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM both have fast and accurate autofocus. The Nikon lens uses a stepping motor for autofocus, while the Canon lens uses a ring-type USM motor. Both lenses are able to track moving subjects quickly and accurately.
Image Stabilization
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has a built-in optical image stabilization system, while the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM does not. The Nikon lens‘s image stabilization system is effective at reducing camera shake, making it easier to shoot handheld at slow shutter speeds.
Price
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S retails for $2,599, while the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM retails for $2,299. The Nikon lens is slightly more expensive than the Canon lens, but it also offers a few more features, such as built-in image stabilization.
Which Lens is Right for You?
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM are both excellent telephoto zoom lenses. The Nikon lens has a slight edge in sharpness and image stabilization, but the Canon lens is more affordable and has better color reproduction and contrast.
Ultimately, the best lens for you will depend on your individual needs and budget. If you need the best possible image quality and you’re willing to pay a premium for it, the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is the best choice. If you’re on a budget or you prioritize color reproduction and contrast over sharpness, the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM is a great option.
Beyond the Basics: Additional Considerations
In addition to the key features and performance aspects we’ve discussed, there are a few other things you may want to consider when choosing between the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:
- Compatibility: Make sure the lens you choose is compatible with your camera. The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is only compatible with Nikon Z-mount cameras, while the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM is only compatible with Canon RF-mount cameras.
- Weight and size: The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is slightly larger and heavier than the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. If you’re planning on carrying your lens around for long periods of time, the Canon lens may be a better choice.
- Filter size: The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has a filter size of 77mm, while the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM has a filter size of 82mm. If you already have filters that you want to use with your new lens, you’ll need to make sure you choose a lens with the appropriate filter size.
Verdict: The Final Word
The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM are both excellent telephoto zoom lenses. The Nikon lens has a slight edge in sharpness and image stabilization, but the Canon lens is more affordable and has better color reproduction and contrast.
Ultimately, the best lens for you will depend on your individual needs and budget. If you need the best possible image quality and you’re willing to pay a premium for it, the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is the best choice. If you’re on a budget or you prioritize color reproduction and contrast over sharpness, the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM is a great option.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which lens is sharper, the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM?
A: The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is slightly sharper than the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, especially at the long end of the zoom range.
Q: Which lens has better image stabilization, the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM?
A: The Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has built-in optical image stabilization, while the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM does not. The Nikon lens’s image stabilization system is effective at reducing camera shake, making it easier to shoot handheld at slow shutter speeds.
Q: Which lens is more affordable, the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM?
A: The Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM is more affordable than the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S. The Canon lens retails for $2,299, while the Nikon lens retails for $2,599.
